Search  
Northwestern
More help... IPR
You are here: IPR home page > Publications > Working Papers



Events
   Colloquia
   Policy Briefings
Research Programs
Publications
   Working Papers
   Books
   Newsletters
   Policy Briefs
People
   Faculty Fellows
   Faculty Associates
   Students
   Research Staff
   E-mail/Phone list
Affiliated Centers
   Cells to Society (C2S)
   Q-Center

Media Resources

IPR in the News
   News Archives

IPR Information
   About Us
   Contact Us
   Job Opportunities

Need more help?
   Site Map
   Return to Homepage


 


 

WP-02-23

Lawyers for Conservative Causes:
Clients, Ideology, and Social Distance

John P. Heinz, Anthony Paik, and Ann Southworth

Abstract

Scholars have devoted attention to “cause lawyers” on the political Left, but relatively little to lawyers who work on the conservative side of the American political spectrum. This paper presents data on the characteristics of and relationships among lawyers affiliated with organizations active on a set of 17 conservative issues. We find that the lawyers serve separate and distinct constituencies — business conserva-tives, Christian conservatives, libertarians, abortion opponents, etc. — and that the attributes of the lawyers serving these constituencies differ significantly. The greatest social separation occurs between the business interests and the abortion opponents, with another clear separation between libertarians and the organizations devoted to traditional family values and order maintenance. These divisions appear to reflect the difference between “insider politics” and “populism,” which is manifested in part in actual geographic separation between lawyers located in the District of Columbia and those in the South, West, and Midwest. In the center of the network, however, we find some potential “mediators” — prominent lawyers who may facilitate communication and coordination among the several constituencies. These lawyers and the organizations they serve attempt to bridge the constituencies concerned with morality, market freedom, and individual liberty, and they convene meetings of diverse sets of lawyers and organizational leaders to seek consensus on policy goals. Nonetheless, the findings indicate that most organizations are seldom active on issues that lie beyond the relatively narrow boundaries of their own interests. When fundamental interests conflict, lawyers appear unlikely to overcome the divisions among their clients.

John P. Heinz, School of Law, Northwestern University
Anthony Paik,
Department of Sociology, University of Chicago
Ann Southworth,
Case Western Reserve University School of Law



To Order:

Hard copies of IPR working papers cost $5.00 each (international orders are $10 each). We only accept checks drawn on U.S. bank and payable in U.S. funds. Checks or money orders should be made payable to Northwestern University and sent to the following address:

Publications Department - WP Orders
Institute for Policy Research
2040 Sheridan Rd., Evanston, IL 60208-4100.

For information, call 847-491-8712 or email ipr@northwestern.edu. Please note that we do not accept credit cards.