Search  
Northwestern
More help... IPR
You are here: IPR home page > Publications > Working Papers



Events
   Colloquia
   Policy Briefings
Research Programs
Publications
   Working Papers
   Books
   Newsletters
   Policy Briefs
People
   Faculty Fellows
   Faculty Associates
   Students
   Research Staff
   E-mail/Phone list
Affiliated Centers
   Cells to Society (C2S)
   Q-Center

Media Resources

IPR in the News
   News Archives

IPR Information
   About Us
   Contact Us
   Job Opportunities

Need more help?
   Site Map
   Return to Homepage


 


 

WP-00-05

Invoking Public Opinion: Polls, Policy Debates,
and the Future of Social Security

Fay Lomax Cook, Jason Barabas, and Benjamin I. Page

Abstract

Democracy, according to most accounts, is supposed to involve policymakers paying attention to ordinary citizens. One way that policy elites might be expected to demonstrate their attention to the public is by explicitly acknowledging, mentioning, and discussing public opinion. In this paper we address two research questions: (1) How do policy elites invoke public opinion about Social Security? (2) To what extent do the claims seem accurate based on evidence available to us through public opinion surveys? We used presidential statements on Social Security and witnesses' statements in congressional hearings on Social Security to learn the number and kinds of claims that policy elites make about Social Security. To find public opinion data on Social Security, we conducted a Lexis-Nexis search of the archives of the Roper Center for Public Opinion Research. Our analyses show that the majority of claims about public opinion are general (i.e., no specific reference to a representative aggregate distribution of public opinion) rather than specific and have to do with confidence in the future of Social Security, the public's desire for reform of Social Security, the popularity of Social Security, and support for presidential initiatives and positions. When the president and congressional witnesses make general claims about public opinion, they are less likely to be backed by evidence than are their specific claims. We conclude by discussing our concern about how well and how accurately policy elites make use of public opinion data in making claims about what the public thinks.

Fay Lomax Cook, School of Education and Social Policy, Northwestern University
Jason Barabas,
Graduate fellow, Department of Political Science, Northwestern University
Benjamin I. Page,
Department of Political Science, Northwestern University



To Order:

Hard copies of IPR working papers cost $5.00 each (international orders are $10 each). We only accept checks drawn on U.S. bank and payable in U.S. funds. Checks or money orders should be made payable to Northwestern University and sent to the following address:

Publications Department - WP Orders
Institute for Policy Research
2040 Sheridan Rd., Evanston, IL 60208-4100.

For information, call 847-491-8712 or email ipr@northwestern.edu. Please note that we do not accept credit cards.