Search  
Northwestern
More help... IPR
You are here: IPR home page > Publications > Working Papers



Events
   Colloquia
   Policy Briefings
Research Programs
Publications
   Working Papers
   Books
   Newsletters
   Policy Briefs
People
   Faculty Fellows
   Faculty Associates
   Students
   Research Staff
   E-mail/Phone list
Affiliated Centers
   Cells to Society (C2S)
   Q-Center

Media Resources

IPR in the News
   News Archives

IPR Information
   About Us
   Contact Us
   Job Opportunities

Need more help?
   Site Map
   Return to Homepage


 


 

WP-00-14

Benjamin I. Page, James R. Simmons, and Scott Greer

Abstract

It is sometimes argued that economic globalization has made it difficult or impossible for governments to do anything about poverty and inequality, because egalitarian taxes and regulations would discourage work, drive up the cost of goods produced, hobble exports, invite low-wage imports, and provoke capital to flee abroad seeking higher profits. This is said to produce a "race to the bottom" of governments abandoning egalitarian programs. Our look at the comparative evidence indicates that this race has not, to any great extent, materialized. Welfare states in the social democracies of Northern Europe and other advanced countries have undergone some marginal retrenchment but remain largely intact. And there remains room to augment the much skimpier U.S. welfare state without serious competitive disadvantage.

Our examination of a wide range of U.S. government programs indicates that some are relatively vulnerable to global competitive pressures — i.e., social insurance programs like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid or the corporate income tax — though considerably less so than anti-government rhetoric often suggests. Others are much less or not vulnerable at all. Among this group are programs involving investment in the human capital of disadvantaged individuals — i.e., in infant and child health and nutrition, or pre-schooling — that can actually reduce poverty and inequality while helping, rather than hurting, the economy. Several programs designed to provide abundant jobs at good wages — i.e., low-income wage subsidies like the EITC — produce net economic benefits or only small costs, and therefore have little or no vulnerability to global competitive pressures.

Benjamin I. Page, Department of Political Science, Northwestern University
James R. Simmons,
Department of Political Science, University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh
Scott Greer,
Graduate student, Department of poliical Science, Northwestern University



Click on the working paper title at the top of this
page to download a free pdf of the paper.*

If You Need to Order a Hard Copy: Hard copies of IPR working papers cost $5.00 each (international orders are $10 each). We only accept checks drawn on U.S. bank and payable in U.S. funds. Checks or money orders should be made payable to Northwestern University and sent to the following address:

Publications Department - WP Orders
Institute for Policy Research
2040 Sheridan Rd., Evanston, IL 60208-4100.

For information, call 847-491-8712 or email ipr@northwestern.edu.
Please note that we do not accept credit cards.

*Adobe Acrobat Reader 5.0 (or higher) is needed to read the Acrobat pdf. If you need to install Acrobat Reader, click the button below. Once the file has downloaded onto your desktop, run it to install the reader on your hard drive.