|
Health Policy Conference Examines the UninsuredSummer 2003, Volume 25, Number 1
In 2002, 41 million Americans were without health insurance for the entire year. The ramifications of the uninsured for both government and individuals are considerable. To examine this issue in greater depth, Bruce Meyer, IPR faculty fellow and economist, assembled a group of top researchers in the field at the Health Policy and the Underserved conference held May 8-9 in Washington, D.C. It was hosted jointly by IPR and the Joint Center for Poverty Research. Conference presenters spoke to issues that dominate current policy discussions,
from the effects of no insurance on health, to immigrant health, to the
rising number of workers who are choosing not to participate in employer-sponsored
health care, to crowd-out effects of varying policies. A much debated issue is that of crowd-outthe degree
to which families substitute public programs for private in health care
and health insurance. Meyer and Anthony
Lo Sasso, an IPR faculty associate and research associate professor,
find little evidence that hospitals and clinics that provide free care
for the poor discourage them from purchasing insurance. That we
do not find strong evidence of crowd-out suggests that the effects may
be small if present, Meyer said. Other researchers found similarly
small effects of crowd-out from Medicaid expansions and other policy changes,
though a paper by George Borjas of Harvard found substantial crowd-out
among immigrants. Jonathan Gruber and Ebonya Washington with the Massachusetts Institute
of Technology reported that the decline in insurance coverage has been
driven almost exclusively by workers who are opting out of employer-sponsored
health carenot because of reduced offering. In response, subsidies
have been offered to employees to encourage them to sign up for coverage.
This, however, is truly a bad policy, Gruber said. He and
Washington found that subsidies induce employees to choose more expensive
coverage and have only a small impact on how many uninsured individuals
sign up for insurance. Other efforts are more successful in insuring families. For those lacking
jobs or access to employer-sponsored health care, Anna Aizer of Princeton
University and Jeffrey Grogger of the University of California at Los
Angeles studied Medicaid programs that have been expanded to cover more
adults. They found that the expansions benefited adults as well as their
children, and they modestly increased maternal and child coverage. These expansions also improved the health services received by adults,
according to Susan Busch and Noelia Duchovny of Yale University. Medicaid
eligibility raised the probability that a parent gets a check-up and increased
the likelihood that women receive preventive cancer screenings. In addition,
the expansions appear to have made it more likely that an adult with children
will not forgo medical care because of costs. The increase in check-ups
and screenings implies that the programs are having the desired effects,
Grogger said. The potential importance of public policies affecting early childhood
health is underscored by research on the long-run effects of improved
infant health during the 1960s War on Poverty. Douglas Almond of the National
Bureau of Economic Research and Kenneth Chay of the University of California
at Berkeley found that the health of girls during infancy appears to be
one of the most important determinants of subsequent maternal health.
Moreover, inferior health among African-American infants appears to exert
a persistent, negative effect on black maternal health, which in turn
leads to poor birth outcomes in the subsequent generation. Other topics covered in the conference included the effects of managed care, why people do not purchase health coverage, the nature of changes in employment and health insurance coverage, health insurance coverage choices by married couples, and the effects of changes in Medicaid coverage for immigrants. The issues facing policymakers and researchers working in the health policy field are complex and pressing. By bringing together a diverse group of people working on these issues, we advanced our understanding of a wide range of policy issues, Meyer said.
|