Search  
Northwestern
More help... IPR
You are here: IPR home page > People



Events
   Colloquia
   Policy Briefings
Research Programs
Publications
   Working Papers
   Books
   Newsletters
   Policy Briefs
People
   Faculty Fellows
   Faculty Associates
   Students
   Research Staff
   E-mail/Phone list
Affiliated Centers
   Cells to Society (C2S)
   ABCD Institute
   Q-Center

Media Resources

IPR in the News
   News Archives

IPR Information
   About Us
   Contact Us
   Job Opportunities

Need more help?
   Site Map
   Return to Homepage


  People section


David Dana

Professor of Law
Faculty Associate, Institute for Policy Research
Northwestern University
J.D., Harvard Law School, 1988
d-dana@northwestern.edu
Additional biographical information

David Dana specializes in the fields of environmental and property law. Prior to joining the faculty of Northwestern Law School in 1999, he taught environmental and natural resources law for six years at the Boston University School of Law. From 1991 to 1993, Dana was an attorney in the Environmental and Natural Resources Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, where he worked on enforcement litigation of the Clean Water Act and handled regulatory challenges in circuit courts involving the Clean Water Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Clean Air Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and the Endangered Species Act. Dana has also served as a law clerk for Judge Betty Fletcher of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and as a litigator for the private law firm of Wilmer, Cutler and Pickering in Washington, D.C.

Current Projects

Environmental Regulation. Dana has been working on a series of papers about environmental regulatory policy that apply economic and political theory to legal issues. The first of three current projects focuses on "risk-risk" analysis. Dana is looking at the long-running policy debate about whether regulators should anticipate secondary risks that may occur when they try to replace an unsafe product or ameliorate a pernicious condition with something that may carry other, and possibly unknown, risks (i.e., the ban on asbestos or the reduction of smog). Dana will look at the extent to which agencies require risk-risk regulation, whether courts should be reviewing these cases, the political assumptions, and how much these concerns should be integrated into environmental policy. A second paper tackles the problem in economic theory of justifying why courts ratchet up punishments for repeat offenders even though the social harm they cause remains the same. Dana is also looking at the growing trend toward decentralization in creating environmental standards. He plans to focus a case study on the role of community organizations in the redevelopment of brownfields. These abandoned or underutilized properties are found mainly in older urban areas. They carry heavy costs of cleanup and often cause conflicts between economic and environmental interests. Dana is interested in the extent to which community groups should participate in the redevelopment of these properties and how this can be done effectively.

Environmental Remediation. Environmental engineering professor Kimberly Gray and David Dana are working with the Northwestern and Kent law schools and the Chicago Legal Clinic to establish an environmental law clinic that will focus on issues of urban sustainability and redevelopment. One of their interests is to tackle urban environmental problems in a highly collaborative multidisciplinary way and to involve undergraduate and graduate students in discovering new strategies to solve environmental problems.

Selected Publications

(1998) "The uncertain merits of environmental enforcement reform: The case of supplemental environmental projects," WISC. L.R. 1181.

(1997) "Overcoming the political tragedy of the commons: Lessons from the reauthorization of the Magnuson Act," 24, ELQ 883.

(1997) "Land use regulation in an age of heightened scrutiny," 75 N.C.L. REV. 1243.

(1996) "The perverse incentives of environmental audit immunity," 81 IOWA L. REV. 969.

(1995) "Natural preservation and the race to develop," 143 U. PA. L. REV. 655.

(1995) "The case for unfunded environmental mandates," 69 S. CAL. L. REV 1.

(1995) "Environmental lawyers and the public service model of lawyering," 74 OR. L. REV. 57.

(1994) "Setting environmental priorities: The promise of a bureaucratic solution" (review essay), 74 BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 365.